SightPhoto Blog

A log of the most interesting photo-related websites and photography news I run across.

Sunday, February 27, 2005

 
It was bound to happen. Photographers being confused with terrorists. After all, what good reason would a person have for photographing in public places, other than for the purpose of having images (well composed and exposed, I'm sure) to be used in the planning of an attack?


ABC News has a story about New York City authorities contemplating a ban on photography in the subway system. Photographers would be able to apply for a special permit, which would allow them to practice their craft underground. Pretty ironic that when Bruce Davidson made the photographs for his groundbreaking Subway book in the early '80s, even having the nerve to photograph on the trains was considered the equivilant of being a combat photographer on the front lines. Now, it might mean special PR-department permission, like be let in to photograph mustard being made at the French's plant. Or, you could take the easier route, and simply be a properly equipped terrorist with a camera cell phone, as one of the experts points out in the ABC piece.


We all hope that reasonable efforts are being made to curtail terrorist activities. But, some NYC officials have made an impressive logical leap: terrorists might do something bad in the subway system; therefore, let's ban all photographers. Maybe the terrorists really are winning.




<< Home


Subscribe to the Sightphoto Blog Feed

Archives

04/22/2001 - 04/29/2001   04/29/2001 - 05/06/2001   05/13/2001 - 05/20/2001   06/17/2001 - 06/24/2001   07/01/2001 - 07/08/2001   08/05/2001 - 08/12/2001   08/26/2001 - 09/02/2001   09/09/2001 - 09/16/2001   10/14/2001 - 10/21/2001   01/13/2002 - 01/20/2002   07/07/2002 - 07/14/2002   02/20/2005 - 02/27/2005   02/27/2005 - 03/06/2005   03/06/2005 - 03/13/2005   03/13/2005 - 03/20/2005   04/10/2005 - 04/17/2005   05/01/2005 - 05/08/2005   07/17/2005 - 07/24/2005   08/14/2005 - 08/21/2005  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?